POST 81: PEER REVIEW 2

Review 2

A well balanced literature review examining key issues from your particular field of research.  The narrative is clear and shows a real depth of understanding of key issues and areas which provide scope for further research.   You mention that the Redding & Quested study is pivotal to enhancing the current paradigm shift in dance education.  It may have been worthwhile expanding on this point by highlighting in what way it is pivotal.  The same could be applied to the statement regarding the Angioi study where you mention that the evidence from this study can be used to direct dance teaching.  There may also be scope to expand the section examining the limitations of the study.  It would be useful to know the ages and genders of the participants as further study could reflect different outcomes from different age groups.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s